Written By Comrade Victor Ojei popularly called Wong Box (08038785262) feel free to chat or text us.
Introduction:
President Olusegun Obasanjo’s tenure as both a military and civilian leader in Nigeria has been marred by controversies and accusations of betrayal. Many argue that he failed to prioritize the welfare and empowerment of Nigerian youths, choosing instead to pursue personal agendas and political gains. In this article, we will examine some key instances where President Obasanjo’s actions and decisions were seen as detrimental to the aspirations and well-being of Nigerian youths.
The Minority Constitution and the Rejection:
During the late 1970s, Dr. Segun Oshoba and the late Bala Usman collaborated on a minority Constitution that aimed to address social aspects of crime control in Nigeria. One of the key provisions was a monthly stipend for all youths, which could have helped alleviate poverty and potentially reduced crime rates. However, President Obasanjo, when he had the opportunity to approve this minority Constitution, chose to reject it. By doing so, he missed a significant opportunity to uplift Nigerian youths and provide them with support and opportunities.
1999 Constitution and Its Implications:
President Obasanjo’s role in the preparation and implementation of the 1999 Constitution, as amended from the 1979 constitution, also raises concerns about his commitment to Nigerian youths. The 1999 Constitution, while it had its merits, did not adequately address the social and economic challenges faced by the younger generation. Its focus primarily revolved around political structures and power distribution, neglecting the need for comprehensive policies that would have directly benefited Nigerian youths.
Personal Agendas and Political Manipulation:
President Obasanjo’s subsequent actions and behavior have further cemented the perception of his betrayal towards Nigerian youths. Many argue that his desire to remain influential in Nigerian politics led him to seek the installation of his chosen successor, even at the expense of the nation’s welfare. In pursuing this objective, he supported a candidate, Peter Obi, and sought to influence the outcome of the election tribunal. Such actions, driven by personal interests, demonstrate a disregard for the will of the people and the need for genuine youth empowerment.
The Legacy of Betrayal:
President Obasanjo’s tenure as a leader in Nigeria should have been a time of great potential and progress for Nigerian youths. However, his actions and decisions have left a legacy of betrayal and missed opportunities. Nigerian youths have endured the consequences of inadequate policies, limited access to education, unemployment, and a lack of meaningful opportunities for personal growth and development.
Moving Forward:
To truly address the challenges faced by Nigerian youths, it is crucial to learn from the mistakes of the past. Nigeria needs leaders who prioritize the well-being and empowerment of the younger generation. This includes investing in education, creating job opportunities, and providing the necessary infrastructure for youth development. It is essential for political leaders to rise above personal interests and focus on policies that will uplift and empower the nation’s youth.
Conclusion:
President Obasanjo’s tenure as a military and civilian leader was characterized by missed opportunities and a perceived betrayal of Nigerian youths. His rejection of the minority Constitution and the inadequate focus on youth empowerment in the 1999 Constitution are indicative of a leadership style that failed to prioritize the welfare of the younger generation. Moving forward, Nigerian leaders must heed the lessons of the past and work towards creating an inclusive society that provides equal opportunities for all, particularly the nation’s youths. Only then can Nigeria truly fulfill its potential as a prosperous and vibrant nation.