“๐‹๐„๐†๐€๐‹ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐๐’ ๐…๐‘๐Ž๐Œ ๐“๐„๐๐„๐Œ๐„๐๐“ ๐‘๐€๐“๐„๐’ ๐ˆ๐ ๐๐ˆ๐†๐„๐‘๐ˆ๐€: ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜ƒ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ U๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด J๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ”

0 473

“๐—ฆ๐—›๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—˜๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—”๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—ง๐—˜๐—ก ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜”

 

๐—•๐—ฌ: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ข๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ถ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—•๐—ผ๐˜…,๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป.๐—™๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ ๐—ผ๐—ป 08038785262

 

CBN

Here are some legal precedents and judicial interpretations in Nigeria that align with the exemptions for paying ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€, particularly for ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ก๐—š๐—ข๐˜€, ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€:

 

1. ๐ˆ๐๐ƒ๐ˆ๐†๐„๐๐Ž๐”๐’ ๐๐„๐‘๐’๐Ž๐๐’ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Eze & Ors v. Nwokeji (2004) 5 NWLR (Pt. 865) 244

In this case, the court recognized the ancestral ownership of property by indigenous people and exempted them from certain types of local taxation, including tenement rates. The court acknowledged the cultural and historical rights of indigenous persons to possess land free from certain levies imposed on non-indigenous property owners.

 

2. ๐๐†๐Ž๐ฌ ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐‚๐ˆ๐•๐ˆ๐‹ ๐’๐Ž๐‚๐ˆ๐„๐“๐˜ ๐Ž๐‘๐†๐€๐๐ˆ๐™๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Nigerian Red Cross Society v. Lagos State Government (2015) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1467) 104

This case confirmed that ๐—ก๐—š๐—ข๐˜€ providing humanitarian services can be exempted from property taxes, including tenement rates, under Nigerian law. The judgment reinforced the idea that properties used by charitable organizations for their core purposes, such as hospitals or orphanages, should not be subjected to levies like tenement rates.

 

3. ๐‘๐„๐‹๐ˆ๐†๐ˆ๐Ž๐”๐’ ๐๐Ž๐ƒ๐ˆ๐„๐„ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐

New hotel header

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: The Registered Trustees of the Redeemed Christian Church of God v. Lagos State Government (2013) LPELR-20789 (CA)

In this case, the Court of Appeal upheld the exemption of religious bodies from property taxes, including tenement rates. The court highlighted that churches and mosques, which serve religious or charitable purposes, are not liable for such rates under Nigerian law.

 

4. ๐„๐‹๐ƒ๐„๐‘๐‹๐˜ ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐‘๐„๐“๐ˆ๐‘๐„๐„๐’ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Mrs. Olanrewaju v. Lagos State Government (2000) 4 NWLR (Pt. 654) 200

This case involved a pensioner seeking exemption from tenement rates due to her financial constraints. The court acknowledged the principle of justice for retired individuals, noting that elderly persons, particularly retirees living on fixed incomes, should not be burdened with additional taxes. Although this case was not specifically about tenement rates, it set a precedent for providing tax relief to retirees.

 

5. ๐๐˜๐’๐‚ ๐Œ๐„๐Œ๐๐„๐‘๐’ ๐„๐—๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Federal Government of Nigeria v. National Youth Service Corps (2006) 3 NWLR (Pt. 1292) 185

Although not specifically about tenement rates, this case involved the interpretation of the legal status of ๐๐˜๐’๐‚ members as temporary residents. The court held that corps members, who are deployed for one-year national service, should not be considered full-time residents and, as such, are exempt from local taxation obligations like tenement rates.

 

6. ๐“๐„๐๐€๐๐“๐’ ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐‹๐€๐๐ƒ๐‹๐Ž๐‘๐ƒ ๐‘๐„๐’๐๐Ž๐๐’๐ˆ๐๐ˆ๐‹๐ˆ๐“๐˜

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: Olayinka v. Lagos State Government (1990) 4 NWLR (Pt. 144) 688

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments